Thames Anglers' Conservancy Members Forum
TAC Members-Only Forum
If you have arrived here and not yet signed up as a member, then please first join at http://forum.rivertac.org/register using your real name.

Forum Membership is with Real Names only.
Please create a Username that is your First Name and Surname eg. "Joe Bloggs"
(This will save our Admin team the need to contact you about changing it)

http://rivertac.org/membership


Thames Anglers' Conservancy Members Forum
 
HomeHome  TAC Home PageTAC Home Page  SearchSearch  FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister  Log in  
Navigation
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
» Thames Semi-Tidal Draw Off 2017
Yesterday at 9:08 pm by Ed Randall

» Eel Trap Results 2017
Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:07 pm by patrick barker

» Fish-swallowing Angler "lucky to be alive"
Sat Oct 14, 2017 8:01 am by Ed Randall

» River Mole polluted at Horley
Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:52 am by Ed Randall

» Petition to stop the export of elvers
Thu Sep 21, 2017 2:16 pm by Ed Randall

» Riverfly Training ~ Hogsmill ~ 30th Sept 2017
Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:56 am by Ed Randall

» Monster fatberg in Whitechapel
Tue Sep 12, 2017 1:40 pm by Ed Randall

» Radio 4 ~ Macquarie: The Tale of the River Bank
Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:28 pm by Ed Randall

» Thames TideFest 10th September 2017
Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:00 am by John LeSurf

» Invitation to the 2017 Eel Forum ~ 17th October
Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:32 am by Ed Randall

» Do you recognise any of these men?
Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:44 pm by Ed Randall

» Roads closed everywhere ~ July 29th/30th ~ bike race
Wed Jul 26, 2017 9:17 am by Ed Randall

» Better access to free Thames fishing in Reading
Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:08 am by Ed Randall

» Eel screens on Water Works intakes
Tue May 23, 2017 10:26 pm by Julian Jones

» River Thames Conditions - Quick Dial Numbers
Sun May 21, 2017 10:00 am by Ed Randall

» Ap[ril showers? If only! Drought beckons...
Thu May 04, 2017 6:56 pm by Ed Randall

» Abbey river this Saturday (12/5/2012)
Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:41 pm by Ed Randall

» Molesey Eel Monitoring Training ~ 29th April 2017
Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:12 am by David Harvey

» Thames Water fined a record £20m for River Thames pollution
Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:54 pm by Stephen Bond

» Crane Riverfly Training ~ May 6th 2017
Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:08 am by Ed Randall

» TAC visit to Tideway Tunnel Exhibition in Parliament
Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:32 am by John LeSurf

» "Citizen Crane" project - sampling dates
Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:24 pm by Ed Randall

» Egham & Stains bankside enhancement followed by brewery trip
Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:27 pm by Ed Randall

» SE Rivers Trust needs help on Hogsmill
Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:23 pm by Ed Randall

» Crane volunteering opportunities
Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:38 pm by Ed Randall

» Seal (with enormous fish) in Thames near Richmond Lock
Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:34 am by Ed Randall

» [Petition] to eradicate size and catch limits for pike to be taken and culled
Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:27 am by Ed Randall

» *Thames Tunnel (Tideway Tunnel)*
Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:42 pm by Ed Randall

» reels for sale
Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:51 am by JeffHowe

» A new address for 2017 ~ forum.rivertac.org
Sun Jan 01, 2017 11:06 am by Admin

Angling Data View
River Levels
UK Map

Thames Tides

Share | 
 

 Assembly sets out concerns about Thames Tunnel proposals

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
David Harvey

avatar

Male Posts : 5380
Join date : 2010-01-21
Age : 102
Location : Surrey,

PostSubject: Assembly sets out concerns about Thames Tunnel proposals   Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:47 pm

The London Assembly today sets out a number of concerns about Thames Water’s proposal for a new tunnel to reduce the amount of untreated sewage flowing into the River Thames each year. [1]

When London’s sewer system becomes overloaded from rainfall, overflows of sewage and rainwater discharge into the River Thames. To tackle the problem, Thames Water is proposing building a new tunnel underneath the river so that any overflow from the sewers can instead be transported to the treatment works at Beckton.

In its response to the scheme, the Assembly’s Health and Public Services Committee concludes that building a new interceptor tunnel is the most viable solution available. However, it says a number of issues need to be addressed, in particular how much customers will have to pay, continuing uncertainties over the planning process and how Thames Water will maximise the employment of Londoners during the project’s construction.

James Cleverly AM, Chair of the Assembly’s Health and Public Services Committee, said: “Every year, 39 million tonnes of untreated sewage is discharged into the River Thames from London’s sewers – enough to fill the Albert Hall 450 times over. [2] There is widespread consensus that this problem is getting worse and we believe the Thames Tunnel offers the best solution.

“However, there are a number of concerns that need to be addressed by Thames Water and its partners and we look forward to receiving further details of the scheme in the future.”

Costs to customers

The Committee is concerned that the full costs of the Tunnel to Londoners are not yet known. Thames Water has estimated that customers will face an additional charge of £60-£65 per year, but no-one knows how long these charges will last. It is also not clear how the most vulnerable customers will be protected if they cannot afford to pay their water bills.

The response says it is disappointing that customers are being asked to comment on the proposal without clearer information on how much it will eventually cost them. It calls for Thames Water and Ofwat to publish these details as soon as possible.

Planning

The Committee believes there is a role for London’s political leaders in the planning decision but it may be problematic for multiple boroughs to undertake separate planning processes. Therefore the Government should consider how the Mayor could co-ordinate the planning process for the tunnel proposal.

Committee Members also say the continuing uncertainty over the planning process should be ended as soon as possible after the consultation period.

Employment benefits

The response says there should be a clear strategy for maximising the employment of Londoners in the construction of the Tunnel. Ambitious targets should be set, which Thames Water’s contractors should have to fulfil.



Link to the full consultation from the London assembly is HERE
Back to top Go down
http://Rivertac.org
Richard Crimp
Admin
Admin
avatar

Male Posts : 1875
Join date : 2010-01-20
Age : 51
Location : London

PostSubject: Re: Assembly sets out concerns about Thames Tunnel proposals   Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:20 pm

Well done the London Assembly! Basketball

Nail on head...


Richard
Back to top Go down
David Harvey

avatar

Male Posts : 5380
Join date : 2010-01-21
Age : 102
Location : Surrey,

PostSubject: Re: Assembly sets out concerns about Thames Tunnel proposals   Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:49 pm

Agree , soon as I saw the comment about bill holders paying it sounded just like the conversations we have all been having.
Back to top Go down
http://Rivertac.org
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Assembly sets out concerns about Thames Tunnel proposals   

Back to top Go down
 
Assembly sets out concerns about Thames Tunnel proposals
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» rotating assembly or new shortblock??
» 1960 Ford Thames van
» 1960 Ford Thames Camper Van
» Tyne Tunnel Cash for kids Cheque presentation
» Write-Up: HVAC Assembly

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Thames Anglers' Conservancy Members Forum :: Open Section :: Conservation Issues-
Jump to: